Are Newcomb problems really decisions?
نویسنده
چکیده
Richard Jeffrey long held that decision theory should be formulated without recourse to explicitly causal notions. Newcomb problems stand out as putative counterexamples to this ‘evidential’ decision theory. Jeffrey initially sought to defuse Newcomb problems via recourse to the doctrine of ratificationism, but later came to see this as problematic. We will see that Jeffrey’s worries about ratificationism were not compelling, but that valid ratificationist arguments implicitly presuppose causal decision theory. In later work, Jeffrey argued that Newcomb problems are not decisions at all because agents who face them possess so much evidence about correlations between their actions and states of the world that they are unable to regard their deliberate choices as causes of outcomes, and so cannot see themselves as making free choices. Jeffrey’s reasoning goes wrong because it fails to recognize that an agent’s beliefs about her immediately available acts are so closely tied to the immediate causes of these actions that she can create evidence that outweighs any antecedent correlations between acts and states. Once we recognize that deliberating agents are free to believe what they want about their own actions, it will be clear that Newcomb problems are indeed counterexamples to evidential decision theory.
منابع مشابه
The Lion, the ‘Which?’ and the Wardrobe – Reading Lewis as a Closet One-boxer
Newcomb problems turn on a tension between two principles of choice: roughly, a principle sensitive to the causal features of the relevant situation, and a principle sensitive only to evidential factors. Two-boxers give priority to causal beliefs, and one-boxers to evidential beliefs. A similar issue can arise when the modality in question is chance, rather than causation. In this case, the con...
متن کاملThe Relationship between Cognitive Performance and Critical Thinking Abilities among Selected Agricultural Education Students
Several researchers have measured and analyzed cognitive performance (Newcomb & Trefz, 1987; Cano, 1988; Pickford, 1988) and analyzed critical thinking abilities of students (Kahler, Millers, & Rollins, 1988; Arter & Salmon, 1987; Ennis, 1985). Past research has indicated that most students show little evidence of using critical thinking abilities when solving problems; in fact, most students c...
متن کاملHow Technology-Purchasing Decisions Are Really Made Understanding How Influence Networks Affect the Success of Major Technology-Purchasing Decisions
متن کامل
Using a Hybrid Method for Formalizing Informal Stakeholder Decisions
Decisions are hard to make when available information is incomplete, inconsistent, and ambiguous. Moreover, good – sufficiently complete, consistent, traceable, and testable – requirements are a prerequisite for successful projects. Without understanding what the stakeholders really want and need and writing these requirements in a concise, understandable and testable manner, projects will not ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Synthese
دوره 156 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007